Retinal Microvasculature in Systemic Sclerosis Patients and the Correlation between Nailfold Capillaroscopic Findings and Optical Coherence Angiography Results.

Background: The comparison of retinal perfusion in the eyes of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and in healthy controls using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). The correlation between nailfold capillaroscopy results and OCTA findings among SSc. Methods: The study enrolled 31 patients with systemic sclerosis and 41 healthy controls. OCTA was performed in both groups to assess the retinal vasculature in the superficial (SCP) and deep (DCP) capillary plexuses and the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area. Nailfold capillaroscopy (NC) was performed in SSc patients and compared to the FAZ area and the superficial and the deep vessel density. Results: In the SSc group, the parafoveal vessel density in DCP was significantly higher in relation to the mean value (p < 0.0001) and in each quadrant of the macula (p < 0.0001) compared to healthy subjects (p < 0.0001). The patients with early scleroderma patterns in capillaroscopy had a larger superficial and deep FAZ (p = 0.0104, p = 0.0076, respectively) than those with active and late patterns. There was a statistically significant difference in the FAZ when comparing early to active (p < 0.0001) and early to late scleroderma patterns (p < 0.0001). A statistically significant difference was found in the type of interstitial lung disease and the deep FAZ area (p = 0.0484). SSc patients with nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) had a larger FAZ than those with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) (p = 0.0484). Moreover, NSIP cases had a higher parafoveal mean superficial vessel density than those with UIP (p = 0.0471). Conclusions: Our investigation showed that the peripheral microvascular system correlates with ocular microcirculatory impairment. The results indicate the important role of OCTA in the diagnosis, monitoring, and prognosis of microvascular changes in SSc.

Unilateral Tamoxifen-Induced Retinopathy as a Consequence of Breast Cancer Treatment-Multimodal Imaging Value.

Tamoxifen is a drug used in breast cancer therapy, which inhibits the division of neoplastic cells targeting estrogen receptors. The drug is generally well-tolerated and its use does not cause serious side-effects. The standard dose of the drug is 20 mg once a day for 3 to 5 years. Available epidemiological data have shown that the incidence of ocular toxicity of tamoxifen ranges between 0.9% and 12.0% and increases with higher tamoxifen dose. A rare known complication of tamoxifen use is the development of retinopathy. We present a case of 57-year-old woman presented to an ophthalmologist with decreased visual acuity in her right eye. She has been treated with tamoxifen 20 mg daily for 7 years for breast cancer. Clinical examination and multimodal imaging methods help confirm the diagnosis of unilateral tamoxifen associated retinopathy (TAR). Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) was crucial in the diagnostic process and differential diagnosis, especially in differentiating it from type 2 macular telangiectasias. The correct diagnosis of TAR is very important in deciding the treatment option of tamoxifen. Based on our diagnosis, the oncologist recommended another course of treatment. Tamoxifen therapy was discontinued and switched to letrozole 2.5 mg once a day. The patient attends ophthalmological examination regularly. Visual acuity, OCT and OCTA results remain stable.

Concomitant coronary artery disease and its management in patients referred to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Insights from the POL-TAVI Registry.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) and degenerative aortic stenosis often coexist. However, the impact of CAD and its management on the prognosis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains uncertain. We sought to evaluate the impact of obstructive CAD, SYNTAX score (Ss), and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) prior to TAVI on short-term outcome. METHODS: Overall, 896 patients who underwent TAVI after heart team decision was included. Pre-procedural angiograms were analysed to calculate baseline Ss (bSs) and residual Ss (rSs). Baseline, procedural and follow-up data up to 30 days was acquired from the national POL-TAVI registry. RESULTS: Patients with obstructive CAD at baseline (n = 462, 52%) had higher mortality as compared with the remaining (8.7 vs. 5.1%, log-rank P = 0.039). Also, after correction for confounding factors obstructive CAD was identified as independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.74, 95% confidence intervals [CIs] 1.03-2.94, P = 0.037). In obstructive CAD, neither bSs (AUC 0.47, CI 0.38-0.56, P = 0.47) nor rSs (AUC 0.47, CI 0.30-0.64, P = 0.72 for those undergoing PCI and AUC 0.48, CI 0.37-0.59, P = 0.75 for the remaining) was predictive of mortality. When revascularization status was considered, patients with PCI prior to TAVI had similar outcome as those without obstructive CAD at baseline (7.7 vs. 5.1%, log-rank P = 0.23) with no negative impact on mortality (HR 1.13, CI 0.62-2.09, P = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, obstructive CAD at baseline evaluation for TAVI has independent negative impact on short-term prognosis. However, neither baseline nor residual Ss values have prognostic ability in patients undergoing TAVI. Revascularization prior to TAVI seems to improve survival to levels comparable with patients without obstructive CAD at baseline.

Platelet distribution width predicts left ventricular dysfunction in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: The role of platelets in the pathophysiology of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is undeniable, but precise relationships between platelet activity and treatment outcomes are a matter of continuant investigation. Among platelet indices, mean platelet volume (MPV) has proven to be a valuable predicting factor in cardiac patients. However, platelet distribution width (PDW) is reported to be a more specific marker of platelet reactivity. Thus, application of PDW in risk stratification of ACS treatment is an up-to-date subject of research. PDW values in the assessment of left ventricular (LV) function have not been previously studied. AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether admission PDW can predict LV systolic function in patients with ACS treated with stent implantation. METHODS: On-admission PDW was measured in 278 consecutive patients with diagnosis of ACS, who underwent stent(s) implantation. Echocardiogram with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) estimation was performed within 24 h of percutaneous coronary intervention. Additionally, patients were under one-year follow-up, and one-year all-cause mortality was assessed. RESULTS: According to receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) analysis, a PDW value greater than 12.8 fL could predict LVEF ≤ 35% with sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 39% (AUC 0.614; p = 0.0177). Only a trend was noted in ROC for PDW and one-year mortality (AUC 0.608; p = 0.0815). Multivariate logistic regression analysis has shown that the PDW parameter correlates independently with both systolic heart failure with LVEF ≤ 35% (PDW cut-off: 12.8 fL, OR 2.8107, CI 1.1401-6.9293, p = 0.0248) and one-year mortality (PDW cut-off: 16 fL, OR 2.6750, CI 1.0190-7.0225, p = 0.0457). CONCLUSIONS: Admission PDW may serve as a simple and widely available predictor of impaired LV function in patients with ACS. Association between PDW and mortality needs to be confirmed in larger studies.

Outcome prediction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Multiple risk scores comparison.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare 7 available risk models in the prediction of 30-day mortality following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Heart team decision supported by different risk score calculations is advisable to estimate the individual procedural risk before TAVI. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-six consecutive patients (n = 156, 48% female, mean age 80.03 ± 8.18 years) who underwent TAVI between March 2010 and October 2014 were in-cluded in the study. Thirty-day follow-up was performed and available in each patient. Base-line risk was calculated according to EuroSCORE I, EuroSCORE II, STS, ACEF, Ambler's, OBSERVANT and SURTAVI scores. RESULTS: In receiver operating characteristics analysis, neither of the investigated scales was able to distinguish between patients with or without an endpoint with areas under the curve (AUC) not exceeding 0.6, as follows: EuroSCORE I, AUC 0.55; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.47-0.63, p = 0.59; EuroSCORE II, AUC 0.59; 95% CI 0.51-0.67, p = 0.23; STS, AUC 0.55; 95% CI 0.47-0.63, p = 0.52; ACEF, AUC 0.54; 95% CI 0.46-0.62, p = 0.69; Ambler's, AUC 0.54; 95% CI 0.46-0.62, p = 0.70; OBSERVANT, AUC 0.597; 95% CI 0.52-0.67, p = 0.21; SURTAVI, AUC 0.535; 95% CI 0.45-0.62, p = 0.65. SURTAVI model was calibrated best in high-risk patients showing coherence between expected and observed mortality (10.8% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.982). ACEF demonstrated best classification accuracy (17.5% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.053, observed mortality in high vs. non-high-risk cohort, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: None of the investigated risk scales proved to be optimal in predicting 30-day mortality in unselected, real-life population with aortic stenosis referred to TAVI. This data supports primary role of heart team in decision process of selecting patients for TAVI.